The above picture a bit upsetting? Its an actual end of term abortion photo.
We at AIM have like many mixed views on the subject of abortion and really is up the the individuals particular circumstances on this one. We do not believe it is something to be heavily legislated on nor do we believe it is the domain of radical action groups. If we look at the American experience of “planned parenthood” and more particularly end of term abortions, we consider that to be nothing short of murder. The following goes beyond the line drawn in the sand as far as human sensitivities go. Artwork – that is something it most certainly isn’t. The decent civilised people are supposed to sit back and take this on the chin? Perhaps Arts funding needs to be re-evaluated.
A Dover, New Hampshire, art gallery will feature an exhibit titled, “Normalizing Abortion: Self-Portraits and Stories,” the aim of which is to showcase the abortion experiences of local women.
The exhibit will open at the Art Center in the Washington Street Mills on October 11 and continue until November 1. Phoenix Mayet, an artist and social justice activist, is curating the show, the proceeds of which will go to Planned Parenthood.
Mayet, who once worked for Planned Parenthood, said the exhibit is “decidedly pro-Roe v. Wade,” referring to the 1973 Supreme Court decision in which the Court invented a right to abortion, though none ever existed in the Constitution.
“I would like to provide a forum for people to talk about abortion and their experience with abortion in a way that normalizes it,” Mayet said, according to seacoastonline.com. She added she rejects the concept of “pro-life versus pro-choice” because both terms “ignore the complexity of an individual’s decision.”
Mayet is seeking submissions for the exhibit that range from “a cellphone selfie to an abstract photograph featuring personal items,” the report notes.
“The idea of self-portrait is open to creative interpretation,” she said. “We just want people to be able to stand up and allow themselves to be included in that community that has sought this solution, or resolution, to their pregnancy.”
According to seacoastonline.com, several presidential candidates have received invitations to the exhibit’s Oct. 18 opening reception.
The basis of the exhibit, according to the advertisement on the Art Center’s website, is the narrative of the abortion industry for many years that “approximately 1 in 4 American women will have an abortion at some point in her lifetime.”
This statistic is used to drive home the message that the procedure is commonplace and, therefore, “normal.”
The advertisement continues:
This means abortion is a common part of reproductive healthcare and a normal part of our collective experience. Yet, news coverage of the issue has sensationalized abortion by addressing only the most extreme cases, those involving rape, incest, or a woman who’s [sic] life is at risk.
According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), however, the abortion rate is at its lowest rate since Roe v. Wade.
The federal agency states:
在 2015, 638,169 legal induced abortions were reported to CDC from 49 reporting areas. The abortion rate for 2015 was 11.8 abortions per 1,000 women aged 15–44 years, and the abortion ratio was 188 abortions per 1,000 live births.
Compared with 2014, the total number, rate, and ratio of reported abortions for 2015 decreased 2%. Additionally, from 2006 to 2015, the number, rate, and ratio of reported abortions decreased 24%, 26%, 和 19%, respectively. 在 2015, all three measures reached their lowest level for the entire period of analysis (2006—2015).
Mayet and Art Center owner Rebecca Proctor collaborated a few years ago for an exhibit titled “Faces of Feminism.” Proctor notes the current show would be accompanied by educational materials and representation from Planned Parenthood and other abortion rights groups.
“This is the time right now, it’s so important,” Proctor said.
The exhibit arrives as Planned Parenthood announced this week it would abandon federal family planning funding for its non-abortion patients because the Trump administration’s Protect Life Rule is returning to the original intent of the legal bans on federally funding of abortion. The rule states recipients of Title X family planning funding cannot refer women and girls for abortions – Planned Parenthood’s most lucrative service.
The abortion chain is portraying itself, however, as a victim of the Trump administration:
For too many people struggling to make ends meet—including those people in rural areas and communities of color—the Trump admin’s harmful gag rule may mean they delay or go without care.
That is why we need Congress to act—and to do so now. #ProtectX https://ppact.io/30qlOJ8
The “Pro-Life” War on Women Has Always Been About Race and Class, Too
As you’ve surely read by now, this week, Planned Parenthood was forced to withdraw from the Title X program, which provides federal funding for reproductive healthcare and preventative services. This…